Ping times from Manitowish Waters.

Pathetic.Warning: Here's a first-world gripe.
Come Monday Morning, the CenturyTel DSL we enjoy at our Lakehouse slowed down to become extra craptastic.

Here are the pings to Google:
PING google.com (72.14.207.99): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 72.14.207.99: icmp_seq=0 ttl=242 time=2268.945 ms
64 bytes from 72.14.207.99: icmp_seq=1 ttl=242 time=2238.784 ms
64 bytes from 72.14.207.99: icmp_seq=2 ttl=242 time=2208.223 ms
64 bytes from 72.14.207.99: icmp_seq=3 ttl=242 time=2177.891 ms
64 bytes from 72.14.207.99: icmp_seq=4 ttl=242 time=2150.244 ms
64 bytes from 72.14.207.99: icmp_seq=5 ttl=242 time=2120.107 ms
64 bytes from 72.14.207.99: icmp_seq=6 ttl=242 time=2089.441 ms
64 bytes from 72.14.207.99: icmp_seq=7 ttl=242 time=2059.193 ms
64 bytes from 72.14.207.99: icmp_seq=8 ttl=242 time=2028.967 ms
64 bytes from 72.14.207.99: icmp_seq=9 ttl=242 time=1998.596 ms
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1998.596/2134.039/2268.945/86.041 ms

And, just to be sure it wasn't trouble between the lappy and the gateway, here's a ping to the gateway:

PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=2.338 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=2.426 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=2.486 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=22.380 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=1.488 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=38.085 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=1.358 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=2.404 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=5.696 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=2.264 ms
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.358/8.092/38.085/11.668 ms

I don't honestly expect any of you to find this interesting or even informational. I'm mostly posting this to keep track of for testing next time I'm up here. Sure, I could just put a text file on a thumbdrive, but I've got the internet to do my thinking for me, Darn it!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
Sorry about the CAPTCHA. This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Syndicate content